AMD Radeon RX 560 with Core i7-7700K at ultra quality Benchmarks

compare to:
change cpu to:
Title
AMD Radeon RX 560
Price
$99
Release Year
2017
Series
RX 560
Maximum Temperature
62 C
Max Noise Level
41.7 dB
Minimum Power Supply
425W
Benchmark CPU
Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
CPU Bottleneck FPS Loss
0 FPS
Benchmark Quality Settings
Ultra Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance
35.3 FPS
Average 1440p Performance
24.1 FPS
Average 4K Performance
13.6 FPS
Memory
4 GB
Overall (GPU + CPU + Settings) Score
68/100

Game Performance (FPS) at ultra quality settings

1920x1080

Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
18 FPS
2018 Battlefield V
35.1 FPS
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
46 FPS
2018 Fallout 76
32 FPS
2018 Final Fantasy XV
33 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
31 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
25 FPS
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
29.5 FPS
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
25.2 FPS
2017 Dawn of War III
45.1 FPS
2017 Destiny 2
49.5 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
44.5 FPS
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
29.5 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
23 FPS
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
24.1 FPS
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
25.2 FPS
2016 Battlefield 1
44 FPS
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
24.7 FPS
2016 Doom
61 FPS
2016 F1 2016
41 FPS
2016 Hitman
43.1 FPS
2016 Overwatch
69 FPS
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
37.3 FPS
2016 The Division
31.6 FPS
2016 Total War: Warhammer
35 FPS
2015 DiRT Rally
49.9 FPS
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
27.2 FPS
2015 The Witcher 3
27.7 FPS
2013 Battlefield 4
36.8 FPS
2013 Crysis 3
31.4 FPS

2560x1440

Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
14.4 FPS
2018 Battlefield V
24.3 FPS
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
29.7 FPS
2018 Fallout 76
17 FPS
2018 Final Fantasy XV
25 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
26 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
16 FPS
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
19 FPS
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
20.7 FPS
2017 Dawn of War III
28.5 FPS
2017 Destiny 2
42.3 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
29 FPS
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
21.9 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
17.5 FPS
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
22.5 FPS
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
23.2 FPS
2016 Battlefield 1
32 FPS
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
16.8 FPS
2016 Doom
41.4 FPS
2016 F1 2016
32 FPS
2016 Hitman
30.7 FPS
2016 Overwatch
47.5 FPS
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
25.5 FPS
2016 The Division
22.8 FPS
2016 Total War: Warhammer
24.5 FPS
2015 DiRT Rally
34.8 FPS
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
19 FPS
2015 The Witcher 3
20.4 FPS
2013 Battlefield 4
24 FPS
2013 Crysis 3
19.1 FPS

3840x2160

Year Game Frames Per Second
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
9.9 FPS
2018 Battlefield V
14.4 FPS
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
16.2 FPS
2018 Fallout 76
9 FPS
2018 Final Fantasy XV
16 FPS
2018 Forza Horizon 4
17.5 FPS
2018 Hitman 2
10 FPS
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
10.5 FPS
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
12.6 FPS
2017 Dawn of War III
14.1 FPS
2017 Destiny 2
20.7 FPS
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
15.5 FPS
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
12.3 FPS
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
10 FPS
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
16.5 FPS
2016 Battlefield 1
17.2 FPS
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
8.5 FPS
2016 Doom
21 FPS
2016 F1 2016
18.7 FPS
2016 Overwatch
24.5 FPS
2016 Total War: Warhammer
13 FPS
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
9 FPS

Questions and Answers

  • Question: From the one hand GTX 1050 Ti is 15 - 20% faster (~10 FPS more) but also 40 euros more where i live, but on the other hand we have RX 560 which can operate with my freesync monitor which I already have, + RX 560 is as fast and sometimes as fast as 1050 Ti on DX12 and Vulkan games (Games of the Future) and Freesync offers elimination of screen tearing and stuter which can make (as i have heard) games that don't run as well playable is situations which other cards wouldn't. Which one would you recommend?

    P.S: Please don't talk from a side of a Fanboy. :)

    Thanks in advance!

    Answer: Well for the raw power aka more FPS. Then the 1050 TI. I just hate to recommend that too you because of your Freesync monitor.

    Freesync and GSync are very nice features to have. I use mine all the time. I wouldn't ignore it for gaming.

    So with that in mind. I would suggest you either save a little more and get the RX580 or just get the RX560 and upgrade to a newer gen GPU at a later time.

    The RX560 should be enough for you to get decent FPS in those games and hold you off until you can afford a better AMD GPU.

  • Question: Hello there,
    I have monitor with freesync and intially I was gonna go for RX580 4gb, but they are impossible to get so I am chosing between 1050ti and RX 560. 1050ti is better card generaly but is RX 560 better choice considering I have freesync?(they cost same in my country for some reason)

    Answer: My opinion on this issue is for people who bought freesync monitors due in part to the monitor having freesync, wait until you can get the AMD card you intended to get. Part of what you're doing when you select a monitor with adaptive sync is you are committing to that line of videocards. I think it's a dumb move to do that then turn around and buy the opposite card.

    If you bought the monitor for reasons that had nothing to do with freesync, that freesync just happened to be a bonus feature you didn't care about, then get whatever card is the best value for your money, in this case that would be the 1050 Ti.

  • Question: Are they the same or...I'm not really sure about graphics cards


  • Question: Hi!

    I would like to ask you guys for some help. The thing is, that i want to build a pc which can run games on 1080p high settings at avg. 60 fps. I choosed these 2 cards:

    RX 560 oc 4gb:
    https://www.gigabyte.com/Graphics-Card/GV-RX560GAMING-OC-4GD-rev-10#kf

    GTX 1050 ti oc 4gb:
    https://www.gigabyte.com/Graphics-Card/GV-N105TWF2OC-4GD#kf

    I know that the 1050 ti is slightly better than the amd card but there are 2 important informations that you have to know:
    1: in my country at the moment the rx 560 is cheaper than the 1050 about 45-50$
    2: i've found a very good 75hz monitor which has freesync feature (http://www.lg.com/us/monitors/lg-24MP59G-P-gaming-monitor)

    The main question is, that the rx 560 & freesync combination is better or worse than a normal non-freesync monitor with the stronger 1050 ti card?

    And one more question, in that case when in games the fps is below than than the monitors refresh rate (like PUBG or stronger games), does the freesync matters? Or it's functioning just like a normal monitor?

    Answer: Having in mind you own a Free-Sync monitor and RX 560 is 45-50$ less,i would go for the RX 560.

    The Free-Sync would push the low fps balanced,so everything will be good.

    A 1050Ti is also a good pick considering the price.But i think the futures favor RX 560 a little more.

  • Question: as the title says :) pairing it with an ryzen 3 1200

    Answer: the 1050ti will be the best choice between those 2 and yes it will be more than enough at 900p.

Compare against Competitors

RX 560 Specifications

Board Design

Board NumberC994
Length6.7 inches 170 mm
Outputs1x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power ConnectorsNone
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP75 W

Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1275 MHz
GPU Clock1175 MHz
Memory Clock1750 MHz 7000 MHz effective

Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8
GenerationPolaris (RX 500)
Launch Price99 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateApr 18th, 2017

Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 4.0
Die Size123 mm²
GPU NamePolaris 21
GPU VariantPolaris 21 XT (215-0908004)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors3,000 million

Memory

Bandwidth112.0 GB/s
Memory Bus128 bit
Memory Size4096 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

Render Config

Compute Units16
ROPs16
Shading Units1024
TMUs64

Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance2,611 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance2,611 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance163.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate20.40 GPixel/s
Texture Rate81.60 GTexel/s